[Some humor for new year's eve. ;) -- Mike]

We let ChatGPT judge impossible superhero debates here's how it ruled

Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2025 13:45:27 +0000

FULL STORY

Every comic book fan has opinions theyll defend until the end of time. Maybe youre convinced Spider-Man could outwit Batman in a fight, or that Wonder
Woman would crush Thor in a no-holds-barred brawl.

These debates are part of what makes superhero fandom fun, even as they blur lines between logic, nostalgia bias, and archival reading of decades of comic books. But what would an AI chatbot tasked to be a neutral referee decide?

I asked ChatGPT to help resolve a few of these superhero debates, including a long-standing classic and some more unusual questions that go beyond simply
who would still be standing after a knock-down brawl.

I told ChatGPT to use research and logic to work out answers that, while unlikely to firmly settle debate, would at least serve as strong positions
when discussing capes and cowls.

Superman versus Hulk armwrestling

I started with a variation on a classic question of strength between Superman and the Hulk. Rather than just say who would win in a fight (Superman usually looks likely to come out on top when they've battled in comics, albeit with lots of unusual circumstances making the final outcome unclear on purpose), I went with a single clash an arm-wrestling match.

In terms of raw baseline strength, Superman tends to have the edge he can
move planets and has consistent strength feats across decades of comics," ChatGPT acknowledged. "The Hulk, on the other hand, doesnt have a ceiling.
The madder he gets, the stronger he becomes, which makes him uniquely
dangerous in any test of strength that lasts more than a few seconds.

So already, the match has a built-in narrative arc. Superman starts strong. Hulk escalates. The AI treated the stakes seriously, setting up the logistics of a hypothetical match. The AI It ran an analysis of a potential scenario.

If this is a regulated, single-round arm-wrestling match with rules and a
ref, Superman likely wins before Hulk can reach planet-shattering levels of anger. But if you allow the match to go on indefinitely or let Hulk work himself into a rage, things get murky. And if the table breaks? All bets are off.

Its hard to argue with that. A quick, rule-bound match favors Clark Kent. But if the contest goes long and messy well, then it's a banner day for Bruce.
Of course, an angry Hulk might refuse to ever accept a loss.

The psychological component here shouldn't be ignored," ChatGPT explained. "Superman wins and likely shrugs it off, but Hulk may rage into the next
week, punching asteroids and demanding a rematch. Emotion plays as big a role as strength when you're dealing with gamma-fueled grudges.

Lex Luthor versus Iron Man on Shark Tank

For the second debate, I left behind fists and flying for a test of business acumen and technology with a marketing twist. Who could score a better investment from the likes of Mark Cuban and Barbara Corcoran on the business-pitch TV contest Shark Tank : Tony Stark, aka Iron Man, or
Superman's nemesis, Lex Luthor?

ChatGPT framed the scenario as a battle of charisma versus ruthlessness. It painted a scene of Shark Tank with the two comic book characters (presumably shorn of their respective fortunes in this scenario).

Tony Stark walks in with style, showmanship, and a proven track record of successful innovation. Lex Luthor brings gravitas, intimidation, and a chillingly well-thought-out pitch deck that likely includes geopolitical leverage.

The idea of big brains battling for an investment prize isn't quite the
visual spectacle of a power-armor battle, but the use of personality and presentation certainly makes for fierce competition. The contrast between Stark's flashy approach and Luthor's cold efficiency is strong, but ChatGPT ultimately leaned toward Iron Man. The verdict came down to audience
perception and investor psychology.

Sharks typically invest in the person as much as the product. Starks pitch might be chaotic, but hed win them over with charm and vision. Lex might
offer better margins, but his moral ambiguity would raise red flags even for Shark Tank host Kevin OLeary. But if Lex frames his pitch around sustainable energy, health tech, or surveillance tools with broad government contracts,
he might bypass moral concerns by appealing to the Sharks' sense of opportunity. Cold competence can be lucrative if dressed in the right
branding.

Super road trip playlist

Musical taste is subjective, but everyone knows the right playlist makes any long trip go faster, even without super speed. So I asked ChatGPT which superhero would make the best road trip playlist. ChatGPT immediately threw some names around: Star-Lord, Spider-Man, The Flash. But it had a clear favorite.

Peter Quill, a.k.a. Star-Lord, is literally canonically obsessed with curated mixtapes. His entire emotional vocabulary is built around music, from
Electric Light Orchestra to Redbone. He doesnt just know songshe knows
moments.

Star-Lord's Walkman is arguably one of the stars of the Guardians of the
Galaxy trilogy and helps define the movies as much as the character. It's
easy to imagine Quill making an upbeat mix of classic rock hits and probably some deep cuts from the same time. Plus, hed insist on narrating transitions between tracks.

ChatGPT said the runner-up would be Spider-Man, which surprised me since
Peter Parker famously travels by web (except for that embarrassing period
with the Spider-Mobile).

Spider-Man has a chaotic energy that pairs well with eclectic playlists.
Expect sudden jumps from indie bangers to nerdy rap to Broadway cast recordings. He might accidentally play a podcast for five minutes, but youd
be smiling. And just in case the stereo breaks, travel with Dinah Lance, the Black Canary. She'll sing you to your destination."

Superheroic logic

Watching an AI chatbot apply its model to the fuzzy rules of fictional logic
is intriguing. Seeing it mimic how people interpret tropes, character
history, and impossible or at least unlikely matchups was amusing, even if it was far calmer than true fans would be.

What ChatGPT does best in these contexts is less about providing an answer
than it is about setting up a way of thinking about these trivial things with something approaching actual rigor. And the AI even produced its own sort of philosophy about these kinds of arguments.

Superhero debates endure because they tap into aspirational identity. Who we want to be, who we fear becoming, and how we navigate those tensions through fantasy."

Next time, I think I'll ask whether Alfred or Aunt May would be better at running an Airbnb.

======================================================================
Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/we-let-chatgpt-judge-impossi ble-superhero-debates

$$
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: Capitol City Online (42:17/1)