AI actors horrify James Cameron and he wants no part of it

Date:
Mon, 01 Dec 2025 23:00:00 +0000

Description:
James Cameron is pushing back hard against the rise of AI-generated actors
like Tilly Norwood, calling them a threat to the soul of cinema.

FULL STORY

James Cameron, a director synonymous with digital wizardry, has seen the
future of filmmaking, and he wants no part of it. Horrifying, he called it during a recent interview on CBS. He wasnt talking about killer robots or Titanic sequels - he meant generative AI, and specifically, its growing capacity to generate entire actors from scratch.

Now, go to the other end of the spectrum, Cameron said, contrasting his use
of motion capture and CGI in Avatar with todays AI trend, and youve got generative AI, where they can make up a character. They can make up an actor. They can make up a performance from scratch with a text prompt. Its like, no. Thats horrifying to me.

Cameron's take on AI acting marks a clear departure from his usual techno-optimism. His discomfort isnt with computers themselves; its the
erasure of the human at the center of the art that troubles him. And for
once, hes not being metaphorical.

At the heart of the industrys current digital anxiety is Tilly Norwood , a photorealistic, AI-generated actress created by Eline Van der Veldens company Particle6. Norwood was introduced in September at the Zurich Film Festival.

While she hasnt starred in a film or even moved in front of a camera outside
of digital mock-ups, shes drawn plenty of criticism from the filmmaking industry. The Screen Actors Guild (SAG-AFTRA) issued a scathing statement denouncing Norwood as a synthetic imitation trained on the stolen work of
real performers.

AI acting future

This isnt just an actors union issue. Its a question of authorship, of emotional trust. When you cry during a scene, part of you is responding to
the person behind the performance. If that person is replaced by an algorithm trained on thousands of micro-expressions, voice samples, and movement clips, it may still work on screen, but what exactly are you connecting with?

Camerons warning resonates because hes far from a technophobe. He's spent decades blending human actors with sophisticated CGI systems from The Terminator to Avatar, but the crucial difference, as he points out, is that motion capture preserves the human core. A server farm didnt imagine
Sigourney Weavers Navi face in Avatar ; it was still her.

Although Tilly Norwood might be just a stunt, it's still a sign of what's in development. When background actors can be scanned once and used forever, and studios are negotiating for the right to replicate voices and likenesses forever, the groundwork for fully AI-led productions is already here.

For now, even the most cutting-edge deepfakes or digital doubles are
typically paired with real actors to provide an emotional anchor. But give it time, and you'll see attempts to remove the human factor. Whether people will enjoy the resulting films is less certain.

Cameron remains unambiguously on Team Human. And while his discomfort might read as romantic or even dramatic, its not misplaced. Because once
AI-generated performers can pass for the real thing, viewers may stop asking whos actually behind the eyes. By then, it wont really matter. All that will
be left is a story, told efficiently, by no one.

======================================================================
Link to news story: https://www.techradar.com/ai-platforms-assistants/gemini/ai-actors-horrify-jam es-cameron-and-he-wants-no-part-of-it

$$
--- SBBSecho 3.28-Linux
* Origin: Capitol City Online (42:17/1)